UMass Amherst Releases Premier Gambling Study In US History

UMass A<span id="more-19222"></span>mherst Releases Premier Gambling Study In US History

A UMass study on video gaming attitudes and behaviors is thought to be the largest in US history.

Gambling is definitely an important topic in Massachusetts at the moment, as the state prepares for the coming of at least two large resort gambling enterprises next few years.

The University of Massachusetts at Amherst (UMass Amherst) has released a study that gives a baseline for the state of gambling in the state now, one that can then be used to track changes in long term studies in advance of that gaming expansion.

The analysis, which comes from the School of Public Health and Health Sciences at UMass Amherst, surveyed almost 10,000 Massachusetts residents.

That’s sufficient to help make it the gambling study that is largest ever completed in the usa.

Survey Establishes Baseline for Future Studies

The study ended up being praised by Massachusetts Gaming Commission Chairman Steve Crosby, who said that it should provide an objective way to understand how the state will be impacted by gambling going forward.

‘The most crucial point is that we are establishing baseline conditions for every socio and economic variable that could be affected by the introduction of casinos,’ Crosby said. ‘Our scientists will then track alterations in those variables within the lifetime of the gambling enterprises in purchase to know up to a certainty the effects and to inform data-driven mitigation strategies for just about any potential negative consequences.’

The survey was conducted between September 2013 and May 2014, with state residents being selected at random to complete the questionnaire.

The result was a wide range of information detailing exactly how people in Massachusetts gamble and view various forms of gaming.

For example, it turns out that about 72 % of respondents reported gambling at least one time over the year that is past.

Many Massachusetts residents (about 60 percent) said they played the lottery, while 22 per cent reported that they had gone to a casino during the previous 12 months.

Residents Like Casinos, But Not Locally

One topic that is hot the region was how Massachusetts’ new casinos will impact current casino operations in Connecticut. The study suggests that officials in Connecticut are right to be concerned: 65 percent of those Massachusetts residents who went to casinos visited resorts in Connecticut, a portion that should go way down if the Wynn Everett and MGM Springfield are operational.

The study also looked into exactly how residents experience the state’s gambling expansion, which includes a slots parlor and up to three casinos that are full-scale. The clear answer was one which is heard in many communities throughout the continuing state: not in my own backyard.

A strong 59 % most of adults in Massachusetts said which they think gambling expansion will either have a impact that is neutral be beneficial to the state.

Nonetheless, 46 percent think that gambling expansion is harmful in their own community, while only 28 % trust casino expansion would be useful locally.

The study additionally discovered that illegal gambling had been fairly common in Massachusetts. About 13 percent of residents had bet on sports into the year that is past while two percent reporting gambling on unregulated online gaming web sites.

More in-depth analysis for the data collected is expected to be released within the months to come. However, major investigator Rachel Volberg states that the true value in this study was gathering information before viewpoints could be shaped by the introduction of casinos.

‘Not many people realize how uncommon it is for the problem gambling study to be completed before some new kind of gambling becomes available,’ Volberg said. ‘The Commonwealth is fortunate that both the Expanded Gaming Act and the Massachusetts Gaming Commission therefore clearly and forcefully supported such an effort and I also am excited to share our findings before any casinos begin operations in our state.’

Interpol Disbands €20 Million Anti-Match-Fixing Relationship With FIFA

FIFA President Sepp Blatter (right) after which Secretary General of Interpol, Ronald Noble, seal the deal. Interpol has now concluded that FIFA doesn’t share might values associated with statutory police force community.’ No shit! (Image:

Interpol has frozen a €20 ($22.5 million) donation, compensated to it by FIFA, to finance a joint anti-match-fixing program.

The integrity that is 10-year Sport initiative was built to stamp out fixed games orchestrated by criminal gambling syndicates, but Interpol said this week that the FIFA corruption scandal had made the relationship untenable.

‘In light of the context that is current FIFA, while Interpol is still committed to developing our Integrity in Sport program, I have determined to suspend the agreement,’ said Interpol Secretary General Jürgen Stock. ‘ All partners that are external whether public or private, must share the fundamental values and concepts of the organization, also as those of the wider law enforcement community.’

The terms and conditions associated with the deal, signed in 2011, state that that FIFA must remain ‘compatible aided by the principles, aims and activities of Interpol,’ but, following arrest of seven FIFA officials because the result of a massive FBI corruption probe, Interpol may be forgiven for feeling that the soccer governing human anatomy has not kept up its end of the bargain.

Why Now?

It begs the question, though, why had been Interpol, with its wide-reaching access to an expansive network of law enforcement agencies, unaware of FIFA corruption last year?

The press that is british crying foul as far back as 2006. This was the that journalist Andrew Jennings published Foul year! The Key World of FIFA: Bribes, Vote-Rigging and Ticket Scandals. The title states it all.

Additionally in 2006, Panorama, a BBC affairs that are current, broadcast a documentary asserting that Sepp Blatter was being investigated by Swiss police for attempting to wallpaper more than a FIFA bribery scandal.

Inside it, Lord Triesman, the previous chairman of the English Football Association, described FIFA as an organization that ‘behaves like a mafia family’,

Swiss Humor

A follow-up Panorama documentary in 2010 accused Issa Hayatou, Vice President of FIFA, of taking bribes. He threatened to sue the BBC, but he did not.

Interpol’s willingness to bury its mind in the sand might have been more concerning the fact that the €20 million FIFA paid to the international police agency constituted more than one fourth of its annual budget.

Finally, though, with FIFA exposed and indicted by the US, the nation that is only dared to hold the organization to task, it had been too much, or to embarrassing, for Interpol to stomach.

On a lighter note, the FIFA communications director Walter De Gregorio cracked a ‘joke’ about his employers on Swiss TV this week, and believe us, it’s a zinger!

‘ The FIFA president, secretary general and communications director are all traveling in a vehicle,’ grinned De Gregorio.

‘But that is driving?’ he quizzed.

‘The authorities,’ he zinged.

Fleetingly afterwards FIFA announced that De Gregorio had chosen to ‘relinquish his office.’

Ritz Club Sues Tycoon Safa Abdulla Al Geabury Over £2 million Gambling Debt.

Safa Abdulla Al Geabury, whose £2 million dud check bounced when Ritz staff tried to cash it the time after his gambling spree. (Image:

The Ritz Club, London’s famously high-end, high-roller casino, is suing a property that is swiss over a £2 million ($3.1 million) bounced check.

In accordance with the Ritz’s filing, Safa Abdulla Al Geabury published out the check to fund a gambling session one night in February last year, but it ended up being a dud once the casino tried to bank it the following morning.

The Ritz can be seeking an additional £200,000 ($310,000) in accumulated interest on your debt.

It has been reported that the casino, which can be owned by reclusive billionaire twins that are identical Sir David and Sir Frederick Barclay, has been plunged into the red by a group of unpaid gambling debts, forcing it to pursue its debtors aggressively into the courts.

Based on the London Evening Standard, the casino has litigated against 10 high rollers in the year that is last in an effort to recoup 2013 losses of £12.5 million ($19.4 million).

Al-Daher Case

Al Geabury’s defense is he is a gambling addict and their staff must have known this and stopped him from playing.

He wants the debts written off, but he’s on shaky ground with this line; in 2014 the casino won the same tall Court battle against Noora Al-Daher, the wife associated with Omani international minister.

The Ritz sued Al-Daher after she had visited the casino in April 2012 and proceeded to lose £2 million ($3.3 million) in a few hours. Al-Daher failed to honor £1 million ($1.65) of her debt. She immediately counter-sued the casino, claiming that the casino had taken advantage of her.

Al-Daher had claimed in court that Ritz Club employees encouraged her to continue playing a casino game of chemin-de-fer, despite having been made conscious of her gambling addiction, and even allowed her to cash checks, which she claimed was unlawful.

She also said that the casino was under a ‘duty of care’ it had failed to fulfill towards her, a responsibility which.

Psychiatric Reports

Nevertheless, the court heard that Al-Daher and her family had apparently happily gambled away $5 million in Las Vegas a few months after her see to your Ritz.

The judge said he was particular that, had Al-Daher been refused authorization to keep on gambling during the Ritz, she ‘would have been eager and likely to gamble at other casinos thereafter, and very probably during her stay in London during the times or days after 3 April 2012. in ruling in favor of this casino’

The judge into the Al Geabury situation, Mrs Justice Simler, meanwhile, said at a hearing that is preliminary psychiatric reports were commissioned to evaluate Al Geabury’s state of mind regarding the time he destroyed the money and whether he was in control of his actions.

‘The essence is whether Mr Al Geabury has a gambling addiction therefore the claimant’s knowledge of that,’ she said.